Evidence Hub

Amoxicillin versus Cotrimoxazole for Treating Non-severe Pneumonia: A Systematic Review

Riana Suwarni, Anjar Nuryanto

Cermin Dunia Kedokteran, 2024

20,646 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Pneumonia is still one of the common causes of death in children under 5 years old in low-middle-income countries. The common cause of pneumonia is bacteria, requiring antibiotics as treatment. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of amoxicillin and cotrimoxazole in treating pneumonia. Methods: This systematic review used PRISMA rules to analyze Pubmed and Europe PMC articles. The dose, duration, and therapeutic failure of amoxicillin and cotrimoxazole were assessed. Results: A total of 336 articles were selected for title and abstract screening. Four articles met the requirements, and two were selected for systematic review analysis. A total of 20,646 patients were analyzed, 11,633 (56.3%) received amoxicillin and 9,013 (43.7%) received cotrimoxazole. There was no significant difference in treatment failure between amoxicillin and cotrimoxazole. Conclusion: Amoxicillin has the same efficacy as cotrimoxazole for the management of non-severe pneumonia in children under 5 years old.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 20,646 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free