Evidence Hub

Cost-efficacy evaluation of a mindfulness-based program added to treatment as usual for the treatment of chronic migraine associated to medication overuse headache

Raggi A, D'Amico D, Guastafierro E, Ciusani E, Montisano DA, Erbetta A, Demichelis G, Fedeli D et al.

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025

154 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic Migraine associated to Medication Overuse Headache (CM-MOH) causes considerable costs in reason of healthcare costs and loss of productivity. Recently, a mindfulness-based program added to treatment as usual (TaU) proved efficacy compared to TaU alone in patients with CM-MOH. This study aims to assess the cost-efficacy of such multimodal treatment protocol. METHODS: Patients with CM-MOH filled in a specific protocol aimed to assess direct healthcare costs, direct non-medical costs, and indirect costs, referred to the three months before starting the treatment protocol. Repeated measure analyses were employed to compare total costs’ reductions between the two group of patients. Then, we compared the delta in total costs after allocation to the two treatment arms using the independent-sample t-test. RESULTS: 154 patients completed the 12-months follow-up. Over the period, CM-MOH cost was reduced from 2620€ (95% CI: 2146–3094€) to 1603€ (95% CI: 1182–2023€) in the TaU group, and from 2978€ (95% CI: 2293–3656€) to 752€ (95% CI: 539–965€) in the TaU + MIND group. The time*group interaction analysis on cost reduction indicated a significant difference (F = 2.953,149; p =.035) with a moderate effect size (partial η2 = 0.056). The average difference on one-year cost after randomization was 2582€ favoring patients in the TaU + MIND group: such a figure is higher than the reimbursement from the Lombardia Region Health System for mindfulness-based sessions…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 154 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free