Evidence Hub

A phase 4, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of rimegepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults with a history of inadequate response to traditional oral preventive medications

Pozo-Rosich P, López JAG, Lisewski P, Aslan AN, Seehra H, Thiry A, Abraham L, Ramirez LM et al.

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2025

328 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Aim This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of rimegepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in participants with a documented history of inadequate response to 2–4 categories of traditional oral preventive medication (OPM). Methods This multinational phase 4 trial consisted of an untreated 28-day observational phase (OP) and a 12-week double-blind treatment (DBT) phase. Participants with 4–14 monthly migraine days (MMDs), <15 monthly headache days (<7 non-migraine) and documented previous inadequate response to 2–4 traditional OPM categories were enrolled. Participants were randomized to rimegepant 75 mg orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) or placebo every other day (EOD). The primary endpoint was mean change from the OP in MMDs through the 12-week DBT phase. Key secondary endpoints were tested hierarchically to control type I errors. Tolerance and safety were assessed throughout the DBT phase. Results In total, 328 participants received rimegepant and 324 received placebo. The most common OPM categories with prior inadequate response were anticonvulsants (61%), beta-blockers (56%) and amitriptyline (51%). The mean ± SD number of MMDs in the OP was 8.4 ± 2.4 and 8.3 ± 2.3, respectively, in the rimegepant (n = 324) and placebo (n = 319) groups. Across the DBT phase, participants who received rimegepant had a significantly larger mean change from the OP in MMDs than those who received placebo (−2.1 vs. −0.5 days; difference = −1.6 days; 95% confidence…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 328 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free