Evidence Hub

Number Needed to Treat and Cost Per Responder Analysis of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prevention in Adults for Whom Prior Preventive Treatments have Failed

Mitsikostas DD, Awad SF, Kongerslev R, Boserup LP, Lee XY, Phul R, Sacco S

Advances in therapy, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: Four monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling are approved for migraine prevention and commonly prescribed/reimbursed after the failure of repurposed anti-migraine medications. Participants achieving clinical response [e.g., ≥ 50% monthly migraine days (MMDs) reduction] during an anti-CGRP mAb trial are likely to continue treatment. We calculated number needed to treat (NNT) and quarterly cost per responder (CPR) across four anti-CGRP mAbs.

Methods: Data were from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3b clinical trials that evaluated anti-CGRP mAbs (eptinezumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, erenumab) for migraine prevention in adults with episodic or chronic migraine for whom 2-4 prior preventive treatments have failed. NNT was calculated as 1 divided by absolute risk reduction (difference between active treatment and placebo in the proportion of participants with ≥ 50% or ≥ 75% MMD reduction over Weeks 1-12). CPR was calculated by multiplying NNT by the quarterly (3-month) drug acquisition CPR (£), based on the reimbursed list price in the United Kingdom (CPR could not be calculated for eptinezumab 300 mg). Statistical comparisons were not made.

Results: All anti-CGRP mAbs demonstrated higher rates of ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% MMD reduction than their respective placebo (p < 0.05). The NNT to achieve ≥ 50% MMD reduction ranged from 2.7 (eptinezumab 300 mg) to 6.0 (erenumab 140 mg), and for ≥ 75%, 6.0…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free