Evidence Hub

Heartrate Variability Biofeedback for Migraine Using a Smartphone Application and Sensor: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Mia T. Minen, Sarah Corner, T. Berk, V. Levitan, Steven J. Friedman, Samrachana Adhikari, Elizabeth Seng

General Hospital Psychiatry, 2021

52 participants · 43 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Although hand temperature and electromyograph biofeedback have evidence for migraine prevention, to date, no study has evaluated heartrate variability (HRV) biofeedback for migraine. Methods: 2-arm randomized trial comparing an 8-week app-based HRV biofeedback (HeartMath) to waitlist control. Feasibility/acceptability outcomes included number and duration of sessions, satisfaction, barriers and adverse events. Primary clinical outcome was Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQv2). Results: There were 52 participants (26/arm). On average, participants randomized to the Hearthmath group completed 29 sessions (SD=29, range: 2–86) with an average length of 6:43 minutes over 36 days (SD=27, range: 0, 88) before discontinuing. 9/29 reported technology barriers. 43% said that they were likely to recommend Heartmath to others. Average MSQv2 decreases were not significant between the Heartmath and waitlist control (estimate = 0.3, 95% CI = −3.1 – 3.6). High users of Heartmath reported a reduction in MSQv2 at day 30 (−12.3 points, p=0.010) while low users did not (p=0.765). Discussion: App-based HRV biofeedback was feasible and acceptable on a time-limited basis for people with migraine. Changes in the primary clinical outcome did not differ between biofeedback and control; however, high users of the app reported more benefit than low users.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 52 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free