Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of a 3-day once-daily regimen of oral nafithromycin in comparison to oral moxifloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in adults: a phase III, randomized, double-blind controlled trial

Himanshu Pophale, Monica Gupta, Lily Llorens, Piotr Iwanowski, R. Gutte, Rajesh A Chavan, Anasuya Patel, Harsh Agrawal et al.

The Lancet Regional Health - Southeast Asia, 2025

477 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Summary Background Nafithromycin, a novel macrolide belonging to the lactone ketolide subclass, exhibits excellent in vitro potency against pathogens causing community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), in conjunction with high and sustained pulmonary concentrations allowing for once-daily dosing. We aimed to compare efficacy and safety of nafithromycin with moxifloxacin for treatment of CABP. Methods This was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study in adults with CABP (PORT risk class II, III, IV), conducted at 31 sites across India. Patients were randomized (1:1) via block randomisation using interactive voice/web response system to receive oral nafithromycin 800 mg q24h for 3 days or oral moxifloxacin 400 mg q24h for 7 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with early clinical response (ECR) at Day 4 in the modified-intent-to-treat population (MITT). Favourable ECR was defined as alive and ≥1 level improvement in ≥2 CABP symptoms compared to baseline and without worsening of other CABP symptoms. A non-inferiority margin of 12.5% was utilised. This trial is registered with Clinical Trial Registry—India (CTRI/2019/11/021964). Findings Between February 2021 and June 2023, 488 patients were enrolled with 244 randomized to each treatment. MITT population included 477 patients with 40% belonging to PORT risk class III/IV. Demography and baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. ECR was observed in 91.3% (220/241)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 477 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free