Evidence Hub

Clinical characteristics of adolescent headache

Zambrino CA, Balottin U, Ferrari-Ginevra O, D'Arrigo S, Degrate A, Santoro A, Lanzi G

Functional neurology, 2000

136 participants

Abstract

We evaluate clinical characteristics of headache in a group of subjects > 12 years to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the IHS criteria. We consider whether age at onset may influence the clinical features. We used a semi-structured questionnaire to examine 136 patients consecutively referred to our division. We considered the following subdiagnoses: IHS 1.1, 1.2, 1.7, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3. Migrainous disorders were found to be more common than non-migrainous headaches. A definite diagnosis was established in 68.1% of the migrainous group and in 86.6% of the tension-type headache group. Unilateral location, severe intensity of pain, the presence of nausea, vomiting, phonophobia and photophobia were features which differed between migrainous and non-migrainous subjects. No difference was found regarding aggravation of the headache by physical activity. On the basis of the criterion duration of attacks < 2 hours, IHS 1.7 was found to differ significantly from other migraine types. With the exception of the presence of vomiting in migrainous patients, the age at onset was not found to be a factor influencing the characteristics of the headache. Diagnostic criteria for migraine were highly specific but poorly sensitive, and those for tension-type headaches highly sensitive but less specific. The sensitivity/specificity of the IHS criteria in adolescent migraine can be influenced by the heterogeneity of the clinical characteristics. In fact, the intensity, the location and the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 136 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free