Evidence Hub

The efficacy and safety of omadacycline plus β-lactam versus moxifloxacin plus β-lactam for the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia: study protocol of a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

Xin Zhang, Dan-yang She, Yinghui Shi, Yunbiao Bai, Yun Fang, Wenkai Niu, Ruixia Xin, Ning Yang et al.

Infection, 2026

248 participants

Abstract

Background: Severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Current empirical antimicrobial regimens are increasingly challenged by rising antimicrobial resistance and safety concerns (e.g., fluoroquinolone-related adverse events). Omadacycline, a novel aminomethylcycline antibiotic, has demonstrated broad-spectrum activity against common respiratory pathogens (including drug-resistant strains) and a favorable safety profile. However, direct comparative evidence to support its use in combination with β-lactams in this setting is lacking. Therefore, the primary objective of this trial is to evaluate whether omadacycline combined with a β-lactam is non-inferior to the standard β-lactam plus moxifloxacin regimen for the treatment of sCAP in adults.

Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial conducted across 8 tertiary hospitals in China. Eligible participants are adult patients (≥ 18 years old) who meet the IDSA/ATS 2019 diagnostic criteria for sCAP, with no contraindications to the study drugs (omadacycline, β-lactams, or moxifloxacin) and able to complete follow-up. A total of 248 patients will be recruited and randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio to either of the two arms. The experimental arm will receive omadacycline (200 mg iv once daily for the first day, then 100 mg iv q24h) plus β-lactam therapy (piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g iv q8h or meropenem 1 g iv q8h).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 248 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free