Evidence Hub

Evaluating an Abbreviated Version of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Delivered via Telephone or Videoconferencing Compared to Enhanced Usual Care-Treatment for Migraine and Mood (TEAM-M) Study: Protocol for a Three-Arm Multisite Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial

Siwik CJ, Tankha H, Hill JD, Visvanathan P, Gaskins D, DeSciscio M, McCarty N, O'Brien H et al.

JMIR research protocols, 2026

145 participants

Abstract

Background: Migraine ranks among the leading causes of disability worldwide. Comorbid depressive symptoms are highly prevalent in patients with migraine and are associated with worsened pain severity, greater migraine-related disability, and poorer migraine prognosis. Despite this burdensome comorbidity, the treatment of these co-occurring disorders has rarely been studied. While mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) shows promise for addressing both migraine-related disability and depressive symptoms, its traditional format-8 weekly 2-hour sessions in person-creates substantial access barriers, particularly for patients who experience frequent debilitating migraine and mood symptoms.

Objective: The objective of the Treatment for Migraine and Mood (TEAM-M) trial is to evaluate the feasibility of an abbreviated MBCT intervention (MBCT-Brief) delivered via telephone or videoconferencing in adults with migraine and elevated depressive symptoms.

Methods: TEAM-M is a 3-site trial with a goal sample size of 145 adults with episodic migraine and elevated depressive symptoms randomized to MBCT-Brief telephone, MBCT-Brief videoconferencing, or enhanced usual care (EUC). To be eligible, participants must meet the criteria for migraine as defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition, have ≥1 year of migraine history, and have mild to moderate depressive symptoms (scores 5-19 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9).

Results: Our primary outcomes…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 145 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free