Evidence Hub

Prospective open-label trial of personalised connectivity-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for migraine

Zhen Z, Li Y, Zhou J, Li H, Zalesky A, Cash R, Feng Z, Che X

The journal of headache and pain, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide, affecting hundreds of millions of individuals. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) offers a non-invasive therapeutic option, yet long-term effects remain unclear. We investigated whether rTMS treatment effects could be extended by personalising stimulation targets based on connectivity between the pregenual cingulate cortex (PGC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)-a neural pathway implicated in migraine pathophysiology. FINDINGS: Twenty-one patients completed all treatments and assessments. Clinical data were analysed using repeated-measures one-way ANOVAs (Baseline, Post, Follow-up), with comparisons being and Bonferroni correction (2-tailed). Personalised rTMS had a large effect on headache frequency (estimated difference, 4.42, p = 0.004, 95% CI, 1.30–7.54, Cohen’s d, 0.81) and intensity (estimated difference, 2.54, p < 0.001, 95% CI, 0.97–4.10, Cohen d = 0.92), at Follow-up. After treatment, 11/21 (52.38%) patients were classified as responders. The response rate was maintained at 52.38% at Follow-up. Changes in DLPFC-PGC connectivity were able to classify responders from non-responders (AUC, 0.80, p = 0.020, sensitivity, 72.70%, specificity, 80%). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, personalised rTMS treatment demonstrated a large and long-term effect for migraineurs. These novel findings need to be directly compared with conventional group-average targeting strategies in future controlled…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free