Evidence Hub

Food-specific IgG-based elimination diet decreased IL-6, TNF-α, and CGRP and improved symptoms in adults with migraine

Zhao Z, Yang M, Wan F, Ning B, Song T, Fu J, Zhang L

Frontiers in nutrition, 2025

98 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background: Food-specific IgG antibodies have been proposed to be biomarkers to identify food that triggers an inflammation response. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a food-specific IgG-based elimination diet by assessing the changes in the symptoms of migraine and its comorbidities, inflammatory cytokines, neuropeptides, and neurotransmitters, and their correlation.

Methods: This was a sham-controlled randomized trial. A total of 98 patients with migraine who had at least one positive food-specific IgG antibody were randomly assigned to either the true diet group (IgG-positive foods were excluded, n = 52) or the sham diet group (alternative IgG-negative foods were excluded, n = 46). At baseline and at the end of 12 weeks, seven questionnaires were administered regarding the symptoms of migraine, gastrointestinal symptoms, anxiety, depression, and sleep quality. Fourteen food-specific IgG antibodies, such as IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, 5-HT, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), in serum were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

Results: At the end of 12 weeks, the true diet group had a larger reduction in questionnaires of migraine (except for MSQ), gastrointestinal symptoms, and poor sleeping, as well as food-specific positive IgG, IL-6, TNF-α, and CGRP in the serum. The difference in the change of "days with migraine in past 4 weeks" between the sham and true diet groups was significantly attenuated after adjusting for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 98 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free