Evidence Hub

The second interim analysis of Italian participants enrolled in the real-world, Pan-European, prospective, observational, Phase 4 PEARL study of fremanezumab effectiveness

Vernieri F, Ambrosini A, Bartolini M, Cevoli S, Coppola G, D'Onofrio F, De Simone R, Granato A et al.

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025

354 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Migraine burden encompasses social, economic, and functional burden; most notably in individuals with either chronic or high-frequency episodic migraine (CM, HFEM). This second interim sub-analysis of Italian participants with CM and HFEM enrolled in the PEARL study provides updated real-world evidence of fremanezumab use in Italian clinical practice for up to 12 months of treatment.

Methods: In this second interim sub-analysis, data were collected from a sub-population of participants enrolled in PEARL who were treated in Italian headache centers and had completed 12 months of fremanezumab treatment (data cut-off: 15 June 2023). The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) during the 6-month period after fremanezumab initiation. Additional endpoints were assessed up to Month 12 and included mean change from baseline in average MMD. Safety was assessed through adverse events (AEs) reported.

Results: Overall, 343/354 participants enrolled in Italian headache centers (HFEM, 36.2%; CM, 63.8%) were included in the effectiveness analysis. Of those with data available, 61.2% of participants achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in average MMD during the 6-month period after fremanezumab initiation. Mean change from baseline (± standard deviation [SD]) in average MMD was - 8.2 ± 7.4 at Month 1 and - 8.9 ± 6.9 at Month 12. No new safety signals were observed.

Conclusion: Fremanezumab was effective and well…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 354 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free