Evidence Hub

Rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine: A phase 3, multicenter, open-label, long-term safety and effectiveness study in adults from China

Zhang M, Guo A, Wu J, Wang H, Zhang Y, Dong H, Liu J, Zhang B et al.

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2025

240 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BackgroundThis study evaluated the long-term safety, tolerability and effectiveness of rimegepant, 75 mg orally disintegrating tablet, for the acute treatment of migraine in Chinese adults.MethodsThis phase 3, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study enrolled Chinese adults with a ≥1 year history of migraine (with or without aura), 6-18 moderate-to-severe migraine attacks/month within three months before a screening visit and at least six migraine days during a 30-day observation phase (OP). After the OP, eligible participants took rimegepant as needed (maximum one tablet per day) at the onset of mild-to-severe migraine attack for a long-term treatment (LTT) of 52 weeks.ResultsOverall, 240 participants were treated and 208 (86.3%) completed the study. During LTT, 203 (84.6%) participants reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and 46 (19.2%) reported ≥1 TEAE considered to be rimegepant-related. There were no rimegepant-related serious AEs or rimegepant-related TEAEs that led to treatment interruption or discontinuation. Mean reduction from the OP in monthly migraine days was observed as early as the first four weeks (-1.7; 95% confidence interval = -2.2 to -1.2), with an overall mean reduction of -4.4 (95% confidence interval = -4.9 to -3.9) days across LTT.ConclusionsRimegepant had a favorable long-term safety profile, was well tolerated in Chinese participants, and a reduction in the number of monthly migraine days was observed during the LLT.Trial…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 240 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free