Evidence Hub

Scalp cooling versus standard cold-cap in preventing chemotherapy-induced alopecia in patients with localized breast cancer: ICELAND protocol, a randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation

Gernier F, Lequesne J, Grellard JM, Fernette M, Gigan L, Morel A, Estienne A, Castel H et al.

PloS one, 2026

196 participants

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) remains one of the most distressing adverse effects for patients with localized breast cancer receiving anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens. Although automated scalp cooling systems and standard non-automated cold-cap devices have demonstrated efficacy in reducing CIA, controlled trials with direct randomization comparing these two modalities of scalp cooling are lacking. This study aims to compare clinical efficacy, patient-reported outcomes, and medico-economic impact of a scalp cooling system (PAXMAN® PSCS 2) versus standard cold-cap therapy in preventing CIA.

Methods/design: ICELAND is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled phase III trial conducted in three French cancer centers. This study addresses female adult patients with histologically confirmed, non-metastatic breast cancer, scheduled to receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (3 or 4 cycles) followed by either docetaxel (3 cycles) or paclitaxel (9-12 weekly cycles) as per routine practice. A total of 196 patients will be 1:1 randomized to automated scalp cooling device (experimental arm) or standard non-automated cold-cap therapy (control arm), with stratification on chemotherapy regimen, menopausal status and centre. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients experiencing no more than half hair loss (NCI-CTCAE v5.0 grade 0-1) from baseline to chemotherapy completion, as assessed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 196 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free