Evidence Hub

Rimegepant safety and patient-reported outcomes among triptan-naïve, triptan-using, and triptan-failure participants: Subgroup analysis of an open-label, multicenter study

Ailani J, Pavlovic J, Pixton GC, Fullerton T

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

BackgroundRimegepant was safe and well tolerated in a multicenter, open-label, phase 2/3 trial for acute treatment of migraine administered as 75 mg every other day (EOD) and as needed (PRN; EOD + PRN) for 12 weeks or PRN for 52 weeks.MethodsPost-hoc analysis of this long-term safety study in adults was conducted according to five subgroups based on current and historical triptan use: current triptan use and no historical discontinued triptans; no current triptan use and no historical discontinued triptans (triptan-naïve); and history of =1, ≥1 and ≥2 discontinued triptans. Triptan failure was defined as discontinuation of any triptan, for any reason, including insufficient response and/or tolerability.ResultsThe proportion of participants with ≥1 on-treatment adverse event (AE) was 57.6-66.3% across triptan subgroups. Rimegepant-related AEs (17.7-23.2%), treatment discontinuations (1.6-3.8%) and the most common AE (upper respiratory tract infection, 7.7-9.5%) were consistent across subgroups. After long-term treatment, the proportion of participants who preferred rimegepant to their previous medication was >75% in all triptan subgroups.ConclusionsLong-term acute treatment of migraine with rimegepant 75 mg up to once daily was safe and well tolerated in triptan-naïve participants, current triptan users and those with single or multiple historical triptan discontinuations.Trial RegistrationNCT03266588.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free