Evidence Hub

Feasibility of a 12-Week, Therapist-Independent, Smartphone-Based Biofeedback Treatment for Episodic Migraine in Adults: Single-Center, Open-Label, 1-Armed Trial

Poole AC, Winnberg IG, Simpson MR, Stubberud A, Vetvik KG, Bjørk MH, Øie LR, Holmboe P et al.

JMIR human factors, 2025

20 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background: Biofeedback is an established treatment principle for migraine, but home-based therapy with proven efficacy is not available.

Objective: This study aims to assess the feasibility, usability, and safety of 12 weeks of daily use of a novel medical device (Cerebri; Nordic Brain Tech AS) for therapist-independent multimodal biofeedback preventative treatment in adults with episodic migraine.

Methods: In this open-label, one-armed trial, 20 adult participants with episodic migraine used Cerebri for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the feasibility of the Cerebri system, measured by the level of adherence to daily biofeedback and electronic headache diary (eDiary) entries. Secondary outcomes were safety, usability, and efficacy.

Results: Initial adherence to biofeedback was high (16/20, 80% in weeks 1-4), declining to 20% (4/20) by weeks 9-12. eDiary adherence remained high (15/20, 75% in weeks 9-12). Reduction in migraine days was not significant (-0.6, 95% CI -2.4 to 1.1 days; P=.47). App usability was impacted by software issues. No safety concerns were reported.

Conclusions: Cerebri demonstrates potential in self-managed migraine treatment, with strong initial engagement and high safety. Usability issues, including technical bugs, were identified as the most important modifiable cause for the decline in adherence. This highlights the need for further app refinement to sustain user engagement.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free