Evidence Hub

Feasibility and safety profile of intranasal third-party allogeneic CD45RO+/RA- memory T cells: a phase I clinical trial (vRELEASE-I NCT06699758)

Al-Akioui-Sanz K, Dueñas Lopez FC, Guijarro-Eguinoa J, Gómez Lopez De Las Huertas A, Lázaro P, Gasior M, Pertíñez L, Clares Villa L et al.

Frontiers in medicine, 2026

Abstract

Background: Respiratory viral infections remain a major global health challenge, particularly in immunocompromised populations. Although adoptive cell therapies using virus-experienced memory T lymphocytes have demonstrated safety and effectiveness when administered intravenously, the safety profile and feasibility of intranasal delivery of immune effector cells in humans was not previously assessed.

Methods: vRELEASE I (NCT06699758) represents a phase I, single-center, open-label, dose-escalation study designed to evaluate the safety profile and feasibility of intranasal administration of off-the-shelf, allogeneic CD45RO+/RA- memory T lymphocytes derived from a third-party male donor in healthy female adult volunteers. The study employed a conventional 3+3 dose-escalation design, evaluating three dose levels (1 × 106, 5 × 106, and 10 × 106 cells per dose). Each participant received three intranasal administrations at 2-h intervals. Safety assessments included monitoring for adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities (DTLs). The local persistence of donor-derived cells in the nasal mucosa was evaluated using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Results: Intranasal administration was completed as planned in all nine treated participants. No treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in any cohort during the seven-day safety follow-up period. The highest planned dose, 10 × 106 cells per administration, was delivered to three participants without DLTs during…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free