Evidence Hub

Cerebrospinal fluid shunting or dural venous sinus stenting to preserve vision in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH Intervention): protocol for an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled phase IIb trial

Tsermoulas G, Mollan SP, Homer V, Kristunas C, White P, Wakerley BR, Toma AK, Robertson F et al.

BMJ open, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is characterised by raised intracranial pressure (ICP) and typically affects young women with obesity. Patients are at risk of permanent visual loss due to papilloedema. Some require emergency intervention to rapidly reduce papilloedema and preserve vision. The international standard of care for patients with sight-threatening IIH is cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting. However, dural venous sinus stenting (DVSS) is an emerging procedure that is offered at many neuroscience centres internationally as the primary intervention. Currently, there are no randomised controlled trial data supporting the efficacy of any interventional approach for preserving vision in sight-threatening IIH.

Methods and analysis: IIH Intervention is a UK-based two-arm, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled phase IIb clinical trial with integrated health economic evaluation to compare CSF shunting with DVSS in patients who have confirmed IIH and are at risk of permanent visual loss due to severe papilloedema. The primary outcome is the global thickness of the peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL), an indicator of papilloedema, measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) over a 6-month period. Secondary outcomes are global thickness of the RNFL over 12 and 24 months, as well as macular ganglion cell layer volume, perimetric mean deviation, headache outcomes, intervention reporting measures (including complications and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free