Evidence Hub

Factors Associated with Migraine in the General Population of Spain: Results from the European Health Survey 2014

Roy R, Sánchez-Rodríguez E, Galán S, Racine M, Castarlenas E, Jensen MP, Miró J

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2019

22,842 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the modifiable and nonmodifiable variables that are associated with and might moderate the presence of migraine in the general population.

DESIGN: Nationally representative cross-sectional survey.

SETTING: Noninstitutionalized population of Spain.

SUBJECTS: Individuals aged 15 years or older (N = 22,842).

METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from the second wave of the European Health Interview Survey conducted in Spain (2014/2015). We estimated the prevalence of migraine and its distribution according to the study variables, and then built a multivariate logistic model encompassing age, sex, depression severity, chronic anxiety, body mass index, physical activity, smoking status, alcohol use, and perceived social support to predict migraine.

RESULTS: The one-year prevalence of migraine was 8%. The final multivariate model (Wald χ2 = 693.00, df = 15, P < 0.001) retained depression severity, chronic anxiety, exercising several times a month or week, and alcohol use as predictors of migraine (odds ratios = 2.1-3.5 for positive associations, odds ratios = 0.4-0.9 for negative associations).

CONCLUSIONS: Raising awareness among clinicians regarding the fact that many of the variables that potentially contribute to the presence of migraine are modifiable (e.g., psychological problems and lifestyle behaviors) might intensify resources dedicated to assessing and impacting these factors in order to potentially prevent the frequency and severity of migraine.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 22,842 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free