Evidence Hub

Sustained Efficacy of Eptinezumab in Participants with Migraine for Whom Prior Preventive Treatments Failed and Who Self-reported Psychiatric Comorbidities: Post Hoc Analysis of the Placebo-controlled DELIVER Trial

Pozo-Rosich P, Tassorelli C, Boserup LP, Awad SF, Lee XY, Ailani J

Neurology and therapy, 2026

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Psychiatric comorbidities increase the risk of migraine disease progression. These post hoc analyses explored whether self-reported psychiatric comorbidities at screening had an impact on the short- and long-term efficacy of eptinezumab in the DELIVER trial.

METHODS: DELIVER was a multinational trial that evaluated eptinezumab in adults with migraine with 2-4 prior preventive treatment failures. Participants were initially randomized to intravenous eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo every 12 weeks. Participants receiving placebo during the 24-week double-blind placebo-controlled period were switched to eptinezumab 100 mg or 300 mg for the 48-week dose-blinded extension, while those initially randomized to eptinezumab continued their assigned dose. Subgroups included participants self-reporting a psychiatric condition at screening, within which participants self-reporting a depressive condition at screening were also analyzed. Outcomes were changes from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMDs), ≥ 50% migraine responder rates (MRRs), and participants who improved per Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC; much or very improved). As post hoc analyses, no p-values were generated.

RESULTS: Of the total population, 122/890 (13.7%) self-reported ≥ 1 psychiatric comorbidity, including 68/890 (7.6%) who self-reported depression. The mean change from baseline in MMDs over Weeks 1-12 in the psychiatric comorbidity subgroup was - 4.6 with eptinezumab versus - 0.9…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free