Evidence Hub

Vitamin D concentrations and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are associated with disability and pain sensitivity in individuals with migraine: a cross-sectional study

Roldán-Ruiz A, Bertotti G, Rodríguez-Vico J, Gómez-García A, Marrero-Fernández P, López-Moreno M

Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.), 2026

72 participants

Abstract

This secondary analysis aimed to examine the associations between biochemical biomarkers, lipid profiles and clinical outcomes in individuals with migraine. A cross-sectional study including 72 adults with a confirmed migraine diagnosis according to the ICHD-III criteria was conducted. Clinical outcomes comprised pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) at trigeminal and extratrigeminal sites, migraine-related disability (MIDAS), perceived stress (PSS-14), and handgrip strength. Biochemical parameters included serum vitamin D concentrations, the (Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), lipid profile and fasting glucose. Independent associations were assessed using adjusted multiple linear regression models. Higher NLR was associated with greater migraine-related disability (MIDAS; r = 0.38, p < .05) and higher perceived stress (PSS-14; r = 0.43, p < .05). Vitamin D concentrations were significantly and positively correlated with higher PPTs, particularly at the anterior temporalis (r = 0.36, p < .05), middle temporalis (r = 0.24, p < .05), and sternocleidomastoid muscles (r = 0.28, p < .05). Regression models further showed that elevated NLR was linked to increased disability (B = -0.35, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.17, p = .001) and lower PPTs at masseter (B = -0.40, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.14, p = .01) and middle temporalis (B = -0.34, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.13, p = .009). Also, lower vitamin D concentrations were associated with decreased PPTs at the middle temporalis (B = -0.38, 95% CI -0.52 to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 72 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free