Evidence Hub

Psychiatric Safety of Tirzepatide in People With Obesity and No Known Major Psychopathology: A Post Hoc Analysis of SURMOUNT

Wadden TA, Oquendo MA, Kushner RF, Cao D, Karanikas CA, Kechter A, Murphy MA

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2026

4,056 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Objective: This post hoc analysis assessed psychiatric changes with tirzepatide in adults with obesity, without known major psychopathology, from SURMOUNT-1, SURMOUNT-2, and SURMOUNT-3.

Methods: In participants (N = 4056) treated with tirzepatide (5/10/15 mg or maximum tolerated dose 10/15 mg) versus placebo, depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation and behavior (SI/SB) were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), respectively. Nervous system and psychiatric disorder adverse events (AEs) were collected.

Results: Mean (SD) baseline PHQ-9 scores were 2.7 (3.0) for tirzepatide and 2.6 (3.1) for placebo, indicating no/minimal symptoms of depression. At week 72, scores were 1.9 (2.7) and 2.4 (3.3), respectively (estimated treatment difference [SE]: -0.6 [0.1]); p < 0.001. Tirzepatide-treated participants were less likely to shift to a more severe PHQ-9 category (18.2% vs. 24.3%; p < 0.001). Using the C-SSRS, 0.6% of participants in each group reported SI, most of which was considered low risk. SB (nonfatal) occurred in 0.1% of tirzepatide-treated participants versus none with placebo. AEs were generally similar across groups.

Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis, tirzepatide versus placebo did not appear to be associated with an increased risk of depression in participants with overweight/obesity and without known major psychopathology. Rates of SI/SB observed with tirzepatide were similar to those of other…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 4,056 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free