Evidence Hub

Acupuncture versus Sham Acupuncture for Migraine without Aura: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Qi G, Li M, Zheng S, Xu X

Journal of pain research, 2026

659 participants

Abstract

Background: Migraine without aura is a disabling disorder for which acupuncture is commonly used as a preventive therapy. Sham-controlled randomized trials provide a more rigorous estimate of acupuncture-specific effects than comparisons with usual care. We evaluated the efficacy of acupuncture versus sham acupuncture in adults with migraine without aura.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized sham-controlled trials. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Wanfang were searched through 9 February 2026. The primary outcome was monthly migraine days (MMD). Secondary outcomes included migraine-specific quality of life (MSQ), pain intensity, and headache impact (HIT-6). Continuous outcomes were pooled as standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) using random-effects REML models with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

Results: Eight randomized trials involving 659 participants met the inclusion criteria. Compared with sham acupuncture, acupuncture reduced MMD (g = 0.46, 95% CI 0.27-0.64; I2 = 0%) and pain intensity (g = 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.72; I2 = 33%). MSQ showed a non-significant trend favoring acupuncture (g = 0.30, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.62; I2 = 59%). HIT-6 scores also favored acupuncture (g = 0.58, 95% CI 0.02-1.13), although heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 80%). Sensitivity analyses did not materially alter the direction of effect. According to GRADE, certainty of evidence was low for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 659 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free