Evidence Hub

Physical examination of the cervical spine should be conducted in female athletes with a history of concussion

Hides JA, Currie BM, Warner EA, Oostenbroek TJ, Dyer BP, Treleaven JM, Leung FT

JSAMS plus, 2026

Abstract

Background: Female athletes may be at increased risk of injury following sports-related concussion (SRC), even after symptom resolution. Residual cervical spine impairments have been proposed as a potential contributor; however, these have not been well characterised in female athletes. This study aimed to examine whether a history of SRC was associated with clinical assessments of the cervical spine in female athletes.

Methods: In this cross-sectional observational study, 156 elite and pre-elite female athletes from water polo, soccer, diving, rugby-7s and cycling/BMX were recruited. History of SRC within the previous 12 months was self-reported. Assessments included questionnaires and physical examination of the cervical spine, comprising range of motion, manual examination, joint position error (JPE) and maximal isometric neck strength. Between-group differences were examined using univariable statistical analyses.

Results: Athletes with a history of SRC demonstrated a higher prevalence of reduced cervical range of motion, positive findings on manual examination, increased JPE and a history of headaches or migraines compared with athletes without concussion history. No deficits in maximal isometric neck strength were observed in athletes with a history of SRC.

Conclusion: Cervical spine impairments were more commonly observed in female athletes with a history of SRC within the previous 12 months, including in athletes who did not report current neck pain. These findings…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free