Evidence Hub

Waning light, waxing pain: The lunar cycle's association with migraine headache occurrence

Yoo A, Keenan B, Vgontzas A, Mittleman MA, Bertisch SM, Anafi R

Headache, 2026

98 participants

Abstract

Objective: To examine circalunar rhythms in migraine headache occurrence in a prospective cohort of 98 adults with episodic migraine.

Background: Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder characterized by paroxysmal attacks. While time-of-day and seasonal rhythmicity in migraine occurrence have been described, little is known about circalunar patterns. Understanding these rhythms may inform headache prediction and guide personalized preventive medication timing.

Methods: We performed a secondary, post-hoc analysis using data from a prospective cohort study (March 2016-October 2017). Participants completed twice-daily electronic diaries, recording various characteristics including headache, and, when applicable, menstrual cycle timing. Participants wore wrist actigraphs for 6 weeks. We tested for a 30-day circalunar rhythm in headache risk at the population-level. We then examined for lunar synchronized rhythms in individuals, adjusting our analysis for participant-specific factors and differences in baseline headache risk. Sleep characteristics and menstrual timing were assessed as potential mediators of the relationship between lunar phase and headache occurrence.

Results: Ninety-eight participants were followed for a median length of 43 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 42-45 days) with an average of 24.2% (standard deviation [SD] 13.2) of those days being headache days. Population-level analysis showed a significant relationship between lunar phase and headache risk…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 98 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free