Evidence Hub

Integrating Divergence-Based Proteomic Analysis and Directed Network Diffusion to Characterize Diagnosis-Anchored Molecular Variability at the Metabolic Syndrome-Migraine Interface

Wang B, Li Y, Liu Y, Han D

International journal of molecular sciences, 2026

452,471 participants

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been associated with migraine, but the prediagnostic phase and the molecular features preceding migraine onset remain unclear. We aimed to identify a diagnosis-anchored proteomic variability window and to characterize pathways, candidate bridge proteins, and druggable targets within a direction-consistent MetS-to-migraine molecular framework. We first assessed the association between baseline MetS and incident migraine in 452,471 UK Biobank participants using Cox models. We then conducted a nested proteomics case-control analysis stratified by MetS status and applied single-sample Jensen-Shannon divergence (sJSD), network proximity, directed diffusion, and drug-target proximity analyses. Baseline MetS was associated with a higher risk of incident migraine (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.18; p = 0.022). A diagnosis-anchored proteomic divergence pattern peaked 4.71-6.76 years before migraine diagnosis in the MetS stratum. The parallel within-stratum analysis in the NoMetS stratum showed no T2-centered peak. We identified 11 direction-consistent novel pathways, seven candidate bridge proteins spanning metabolic, endothelial, and brain tissues, and three candidate drugs. These findings support a diagnosis-stratified framework for studying MetS-related migraine and provide testable hypotheses for future mechanistic and pharmacological evaluation.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 452,471 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free