Evidence Hub

Natural History and Treatment Outcomes of Congenital Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: A Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort Study

Coppo P, Scully M, Kremer Hovinga JA, Joly BS, Veyradier A, Du P, Patwari P, Wang LT et al.

Journal of health economics and outcomes research, 2026

78 participants

Abstract

Background: Congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (cTTP) is an ultra-rare, life-threatening thrombotic disorder. The real-world clinical trajectory and management of cTTP are not well defined.

Objectives: Describe patient characteristics, quantify the incidence and prevalence of clinical manifestations and disease-related complications, and describe treatment patterns and treatment-related outcomes of patients with cTTP.

Methods: In this retrospective, multinational, longitudinal cohort study, data were abstracted from the medical records of patients with severe hereditary ADAMTS13 deficiency (<10% activity) at 9 participating sites across Europe and the United States. Eligible patients experienced an index event (cTTP diagnosis, an acute TTP event or TTP manifestation, a cTTP-related clinical event, or prophylaxis) between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2017. Data collection was from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2020. A post hoc analysis was conducted among patients who matched inclusion criteria for a phase 3 trial (NCT03393975), and who received plasma-based therapy (PBT) prophylaxis at least once per month, up to 3 times per week.

Results: Medical records from 78 patients (61 [78.2%] female) were included in the study. The mean (SD) follow-up was 8.1 (3.1) years. Ninety-two acute TTP events were recorded in 55 (70.5%) patients (overall event rate, 0.145 events per person-year). Eighty (87.0%) acute TTP events occurred in the absence of prophylactic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 78 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free