Evidence Hub

Long-term use of rozanolixizumab in generalised myasthenia gravis: final pooled analysis of the phase III MycarinG study and two open-label extensions

Bril V, Drużdż A, Grosskreutz J, Habib AA, Mantegazza R, Sacconi S, Utsugisawa K, Vu T et al.

Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2026

188 participants

Abstract

Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disease characterised by fluctuating and fatigable muscle weakness. In the randomised, double-blind phase III MycarinG study, one 6-week rozanolixizumab cycle significantly improved MG-specific outcomes versus placebo and was generally well tolerated in patients with generalised MG (gMG).

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of cyclic rozanolixizumab treatment.

Design: A pooled analysis of the MycarinG, MG0004 and MG0007 studies.

Methods: Following MycarinG, eligible patients could enrol in the open-label extension studies MG0004 or MG0007 to receive rozanolixizumab 7 or 10 mg/kg. In MG0004, patients received chronic weekly treatment for ⩽52 weeks. In MG0007, after an initial 6-week treatment cycle, subsequent cycles were based on symptom worsening (investigator's discretion). Final efficacy data were pooled across MycarinG, MG0004 (first 6 weeks) and MG0007 for patients receiving ⩾2 symptom-driven cycles. Efficacy endpoints included change from baseline (CFB) in MG Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), MG Composite (MGC) and Quantitative MG (QMG) scores. Safety outcomes were assessed in patients who received ⩾1 cycle with a ⩽8-week follow-up period across MycarinG and MG0007.

Results: Overall, 188 patients received ⩾1 cycle and 129 received ⩾2 symptom-driven cycles. Across Cycles 1-13, mean (standard deviation) CFB to Day 43 in MG-ADL score ranged from -3.2 (3.3 (n = 113; Cycle 3)) to -6.0 (3.9 (n = 24; Cycle…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 188 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free