Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of rimegepant 75 mg for acute treatment of migraine: a pooled analysis of four randomized, placebo-controlled trials

Tepper SJ, Pavlovic JM, Yu S, Lipton RB, Pixton G, Zou Y, Fountaine RJ, Semel D

Postgraduate medicine, 2025

4,895 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This pooled analysis of data from four randomized placebo-controlled trials summarizes the efficacy and safety of rimegepant for acute treatment of migraine.

METHODS: In all studies, participants were aged ≥18 years and had a ≥ 1-year history of migraine, two to eight migraine attacks of moderate or severe pain intensity per month, and attacks lasting 4-72 hours if untreated. Participants were provided with a single dose of rimegepant 75 mg or placebo to treat a single migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity within the next 45 days. Co-primary endpoints at 2 hours post-dose were pain freedom and freedom from the most bothersome symptom (MBS). Treatment comparisons utilized Mantel-Haenszel risk estimation with stratification by study and prophylactic migraine medication use randomization stratum; p values are nominal. On-treatment adverse events (AEs) were also assessed.

RESULTS: Overall, 4,895 participants received rimegepant (n = 2,439) or placebo (n = 2,456). For the co-primary endpoints, the proportion of participants with pain freedom 2 hours post-dose (20.0% vs. 11.8%; p 1% of participants was nausea (rimegepant = 1.4%, placebo = 1.3%). Severe AEs occurred in 0.3% and 0.1% of participants in the rimegepant and placebo groups, respectively. Serious AEs occurred in 0.1% of participants in both groups; none were deemed related to study treatment.

CONCLUSION: In this pooled analysis of four randomized placebo-controlled trials, a single dose of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 4,895 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free