Evidence Hub

Evaluation of Arabic-Language AI Chatbot Responses to Migraine-Related Questions: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Aljaafari D, Aljumah HK, Alzuwayr MA, Al-Essa YM, Alradhi HA, Alabdali MM, Almuslim N, Alqarni MA et al.

Journal of clinical medicine, 2026

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Migraine is a common and disabling neurological disorder, and many individuals increasingly seek information online. With the growing use of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, for patient education, concerns have emerged regarding the quality and reliability of the responses they generate, particularly in Arabic, where evidence remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability, quality, and accuracy of Arabic-language responses to frequently asked questions (FAQs) about migraine. Methods: A total of 25 FAQs were selected using a multisource approach and entered into four LLMs (ChatGPT-4.1, Gemini 3 Flash, DeepSeek-V3.2, and Grok 4.1), generating 100 responses. Responses were evaluated by a panel of expert neurologists using the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Global Quality Scale (GQS), and an accuracy scale. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Significant differences were observed between chatbots for mDISCERN and GQS (both p p = 0.072). DeepSeek and Grok demonstrated the highest mDISCERN scores (34.07 ± 1.31 and 34.29 ± 2.59, respectively), while DeepSeek achieved the highest GQS (4.95 ± 0.13). The clearest between-model differences were observed in source transparency and communication of uncertainty. Inter-rater reliability was good across all instruments (ICC range, 0.799-0.831). Conclusions: Medical content generated by the chatbots was broadly comparable, whereas…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free