Evidence Hub

Press needle for aspiration pneumonia prevention in older adults: Study protocol for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

S. Kaneko, Akiko Kikuchi, S. Takayama, Ryutaro Arita, Minoru Ohsawa, Tetsuharu Kamiya, Tadashi Ishii

Medicine, 2023

140 participants

Abstract

Background: Pneumonia is the fifth most common cause of death among the Japanese population, with 97% of the deaths occurring among older adults aged ≥65 years. The incidence ratio of aspiration pneumonia is high among the older adults. Therefore, its prophylaxis is important in geriatric medicine. In our previous studies, we reported that stimulation of acupoints at stomach meridian 36 and kidney meridian 3 of the lower limbs with a press needle improved the swallowing function of patients with dysphagia. Improvements in swallowing function may prevent aspiration pneumonia. This study aims to investigate the protective efficacy of press needle stimulation in the lower limbs for aspiration pneumonia. Methods/design: This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 140 patients with cerebrovascular disorder and a history of aspiration pneumonia will be recruited from 6 centers and randomly assigned to either the real or sham press needle group in a 1:1 ratio. The press needle will be replaced twice a week. The treatment will be administered bilaterally at acupoints stomach meridian 36 and kidney meridian 3. The primary outcome is the frequency of aspiration pneumonia onset. The secondary outcome is the improvement of the latent time of the swallowing reflex. The study period is of 12-month. The primary outcome will be evaluated throughout the study period, while the secondary outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 1st month, 6th month, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 140 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free