Evidence Hub

Prevalence of Pulsatile Tinnitus Among Patients With Migraine

Weinreich HM, Carey JP

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2016

145 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of pulsatile tinnitus (PT) among patients with a diagnosis of migraine and to determine if treatment of migraine improves symptoms.

STUDY DESIGN: Single-institution retrospective patient review.

SETTING: Academic tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS: Billing data capturing ICD-9 codes 346.xx and 388.3x was used to identify patients with history of migraine and tinnitus. Patients were excluded if the symptom of PT could be attributed to an alternate diagnosis. Data were extracted from the patients' electronic medical records.

INTERVENTION(S): Therapeutic patients were prescribed a strict migraine diet with or without migraine medication.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Subjective improvement in tinnitus as documented in electronic medical records.

RESULTS: One thousand two hundred four patients were identified with an ICD-9 code for migraine and of those patients, 12% (n = 145) had an ICD-9 code for tinnitus. After ruling out alternative causes, the prevalence of PT among all patients with migraine was 1.9%. Of migrainers with PT who underwent migraine treatment, 11 out of 16 reported resolution or improvement of their PT.

CONCLUSION: PT can be observed in the context of migraine. Migraine treatment with avoidance of dietary triggers with or without medication can possibly lead to resolution of PT.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 145 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free