Evidence Hub

Headaches in patients with radiosurgically treated occipital arteriovenous malformations

Kurita H, Ueki K, Shin M, Kawamoto S, Sasaki T, Tago M, Kirino T

Journal of neurosurgery, 2000

37 participants

Abstract

OBJECT: The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence, characteristics, and radiosurgical outcomes of headaches associated with occipital arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

METHODS: The authors reviewed the medical records of 37 consecutive patients with occipital AVMs who had been treated by radiosurgery to identify the radiological features of the AVMs before and after treatment and the clinical features and outcomes of headaches described in accordance with the criteria of the International Headache Society (IHS). Thirty-six patients (97.3%) were followed for a mean period of 46.6 months. The median volume of the AVMs was 1.9 cm3, to which a mean radiation dose of 21.6 Gy was delivered. In the entire study group, periodic headaches were found in 17 patients (45.9%), of whom seven (18.9%) suffered from migraines with the characteristic visual aura. Migraine was predominantly found in patients with right-sided (p = 0.038) or laterally located (p = 0.025) AVMs. Factors associated with a higher incidence of any type of headache included larger nidus volume (p = 0.02), tortuous change of feeding artery (p = 0.036), and cortical drainage with reflux in the superior sagittal sinus (p = 0.032). The actuarial rate of angiographic obliteration was 71.6% at 3 years. Headaches resolved or improved in 12 (70.6%) of 17 patients, including six (85.7%) of seven with migraine. The outcome of headache closely correlated with the obliteration results of the AVM (p = 0.002).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 37 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free