Evidence Hub

Sex-related disparities in migraine recognition and management: insights from a tertiary headache center cohort

Cornelius Angerhöfer, C. Hoehne, Marlene Ulrich, K. S. Lange, M. Fitzek, Yones Salim, Uwe Reuter, L. H. Overeem et al.

The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2025

1,130 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

Migraine is a highly prevalent and disabling neurological disorder that is often underdiagnosed and undertreated, particularly in early stages of care. Sex-related factors may contribute to this gap. This study investigates sex-related disparities in migraine recognition and management before and after presentation at a tertiary headache center and examines whether these disparities are linked to differences in clinical presentation. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we included patients diagnosed with migraine between December 2015 and January 2023 at the Headache Center of Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin. We analyzed sex-related differences in prior diagnosis, clinical presentation, migraine burden, and treatment strategies both before referral and following tertiary care evaluation. Among 1,130 patients with migraine (82% women, 18% men), men were significantly less likely than women to have received a migraine diagnosis prior to tertiary center evaluation (57.0% vs. 73.8%; OR = 0.47, p < 0.001). Clinical presentation also differed between sexes: men reported lower pain intensity and shorter attack duration, whereas women more frequently experienced unilateral headache, nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and osmophobia. In women, canonical migraine features (unilateral headache, pulsating pain, aggravation by physical activity, and migraine-associated symptoms) were each associated with lower odds of missed diagnosis before referral. By contrast, in men,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,130 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free