Evidence Hub

Prothrombotic states in migraine

Rajan R, Ahluwalia J, Lal V

Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 2014

101 participants

Abstract

The increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with migraine remains unexplained. Prothrombotic states are thought to contribute to this increased risk. The present study aimed to compare the prevalence of prothrombotic states in patients with migraine and headache-free controls. We conducted a case-control study to screen for prothrombotic states protein C, protein S (PS), antithrombin III, factor V Leiden, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 antibodies in 101 consecutive patients with migraine and 148 controls. An underlying prothrombotic state was encountered in 11.8% of the patients with migraine, PS deficiency being the most common (4.0%). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of prothrombotic states in patients with migraine compared to controls. Traditional prothrombotic states do not seem to have a higher prevalence in patients with migraine compared to controls.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 101 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free