Evidence Hub

Evaluation of the effect of montelukast drug in improving the clinical condition of patients with COVID-19 in referral hospitals in Isfahan; a randomized clinical trial

M. Pourahmad, Amir Aria, M. Momenzadeh, Fatemeh Nikoukar, B. Ataei, F. Khorvash, M. Shams, K. Shahzamani et al.

Journal of Nephropharmacology, 2024

67 participants

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 is associated with a cascade of inflammatory responses potentially lead to devastating outcomes. Objectives: The current study aims to investigate the efficacy of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), on laboratory parameters in COVID-19 infection. Patients and Methods: The current randomized clinical trial (RCT) conducted on 67 patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia in 2020-2021. All patients received treatments according to the national guidelines, while the case group additionally applied 10 mg montelukast for 14 days. The clinical disease improvement and laboratory data (complete blood cells count and differentiation, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), D-dimer, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were assessed within two weeks after the infection and compared between the groups. Results: Baseline assessed parameters did not differ between the groups (P>0.05). A significant decrease in pulse rate, also in normal ranges, was notified in the montelukast-treated group compared with the baseline (P=0.001) and with controls (P=0.033); however, other vital signs were not statistically different (P>0.05). CRP (P<0.001), ESR (P=0.008), BUN (P=0.015), and AST (P<0.001) significantly decreased in the post-intervention assessment of the montelukast-treated group. The comparison of the groups in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 67 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free