Evidence Hub

Effectiveness, tolerability and response predictors of preventive anti-CGRP mAbs for migraine in patients over 65 years old: a multicenter real-world case-control study

A. González-Martínez, A. Sanz-García, D. García-Azorín, J. Rodríguez-Vico, Alex Jaimes, Andrea Gómez García, Javier Casas Limón, Javier Díaz de Terán et al.

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2023

228 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical characteristics, effectiveness, and tolerability of preventive anti-CGRP mAbs in the elderly. Anti-CGRP mAbs have demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with migraine although there is limited information regarding the elderly.

DESIGN

We performed a multicenter case-control study of cases(patients over 65 years old) and controls(sex-matched patients under 55 years old) with migraine receiving anti-CGRP mAbs.

METHODS

We included the demographic characteristics, effectiveness-reduction in the number of monthly headache days(MHD) and monthly migraine days(MMD),30%,50% and 75% responder rates- and treatment emergent adverse events(TEAEs);the primary endpoint was the 50% response rate regarding MHD at weeks 20-24; exploratory 50% response predictors in the elderly were evaluated.

RESULTS

228 patients were included-114 cases,114 controls-. Among cases 84.2%(96/114) were women,79.8%(91/114)CM;mean age of cases 70.1 years old(range:66-86);mean age of controls was 42.9 years old(range:38-49). Cases had a higher percentage of vascular risk factors(p < 0.05),older age of onset(p < 0.001) and more reported prior preventive treatments(p < 0.001). Regarding effectiveness, in cases, 50% response rate was achieved by 59.2%(90/152) at 20-24 weeks, with lower reduction in the MHD at 8-12 weeks [5(7.2),8(9.1);p=0.001] and a higher reduction in MMD at 20-24 weeks [10.7(9.1), 9.2(7.7);p=0.04] compared to the control group. The percentage of a TEAEs was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 228 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free