Evidence Hub

Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome Patients with a History of Migraine: A Retrospective Case-control Study

Masaaki Imai, M. Shimoda, Shinri Oda, Kaori Hoshikawa, T. Osada, Rie Aoki, Azusa Sunaga

Internal medicine, 2022

98 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

Objective We investigated the clinical characteristics of patients with reversible cerebral vasoconstrictor syndrome who had a history of migraine before the onset and considered the relationship between these two pathologies. Methods We investigated 98 patients who underwent magnetic resonance angiography within 14 days of the onset of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome at our hospital. Of these, 11 cases involved recurrences, so data from 87 patients were analyzed. Materials All consecutive patients diagnosed with reversible cerebral vasoconstrictor syndrome at our institution between October 2010 and July 2021. Results Fifty of the 87 patients (57%) had a history of migraine. A multivariate analysis revealed that the following clinical factors were significantly more frequent in patients with a history of migraine than in those without such a history: female sex; emotional situations as a trigger of the onset; presence of deep and subcortical white matter hyperintensity, absence of vasoconstriction in the M1 portion of the middle cerebral artery, and absence of other cerebral lesions on initial magnetic resonance imaging; absence of vasoconstriction of the basilar artery on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging; and progression of deep and subcortical white matter hyperintensity in the chronic stage. Conclusion Reversible cerebral vasoconstrictor syndrome patients with a history of migraine showed clinical features of migraine, including one aspect of cerebral…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 98 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free