Evidence Hub

Exploring the multifaceted characteristics of aura in migraine: A multicenter, cross-sectional study

Giorgio Dalla Volta, A. Russo, M. Silvestro, R. Ornello, V. Caponnetto, S. Sacco, P. Zavarise, Matteo Cortinovis et al.

Cephalalgia, 2024

272 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Background Migraine with aura (MwA) is a debilitating disorder characterized by paroxysmal attacks of pain preceded or accompanied by reversible neurological symptoms. While the pathophysiology remains unclear, trigeminovascular system activation and cortical spreading depression have been implicated. This study aims to comprehensively investigate and characterize the diverse clinical features and manifestations of aura, as well as the types of acute medications self-administered for aura management. Methods A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the Italian Headache Registry (RICe). Aura characteristics, frequency, duration and associated migraine premonitory symptoms were collected. Acute medication use and timing (headache or aura phase) were assessed. Results The study included 272 patients with a diagnosis of MwA. Most patients (99.3%) experienced typical aura symptoms, with visual aura (96.3%) being the most prevalent, followed by sensory (33.0%) and speech and/or language aura (25.6%). Brainstem aura (8.5%) and motor aura (1.8%) were less common. Notably, 13.0% of patients reported aura relapses within 24 hours. Triptans (39.7%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (47.8%) and nutraceuticals (59.9%) were commonly used for acute aura management. Conclusions This study reports several different aura manifestations, highlighting atypical features, aura relapse rates and treatment approaches for aura. These findings could contribute to a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 272 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free