Evidence Hub

Alexithymia and psychological distress in fibromyalgia and chronic migraine: A cross-sectional study

Ada Ghiggia, Sara Bottiroli, V. Lingiardi, C. Tassorelli, F. Galli, L. Castelli

Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 2022

280 participants · 22 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have shown a strong association between alexithymia and psychological distress in both healthy and clinical populations. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and association between alexithymia and psychological distress in individuals with fibromyalgia (FM) and chronic migraine (CM) compared with healthy controls (HC).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted. Two hundred fifty women with FM (age: 51.2 ± 10.5) and 250 women with CM (age: 46.1 ± 11.5) were assessed with the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and compared with HCs (n = 280; age: 51.8 ± 9.0) by one-way analyses of variance. A moderation analysis was performed to examine the moderation effect of groups on the relationship between alexithymia and psychological distress.

RESULTS

Differences between groups showed significantly higher scores for TAS-20 [F(2,755) = 11.7, p < .001] and HADS [F(2,763) = 31.7, p < .001] in FM, compared with CM and HCs. The moderation analysis showed that both clinical groups and TAS-20 (β = 0.20, p < .001) were significant predictors, as well as the interaction terms. The slope of the correlation curve was more pronounced in the patient groups, indicating that the degree of alexithymia had a significantly higher influence on the HADS total score in the patient groups.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest a common psychological dysregulation in FM and CM, with a slight but greater prevalence…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 280 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free