Evidence Hub

Network meta-analysis on 4 types of traditional Chinese medicine injections in the treatment of senile severe pneumonia

Yangli Tu, Changbing Wu, Liang Chen, Yin-Zhi Cen, Jie Liu

Medicine, 2024

2,598 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background: As the global population ages, senile severe pneumonia has become a prominent health challenge. Conventional drug treatments have limitations. Meanwhile, 4 types of traditional Chinese medicine injections have shown potential. Thus, it’s necessary to use network meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate their combined effect with conventional drugs on this disease. Methods: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP shop Database, WanFang database, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were included in randomized controlled studies on traditional Chinese medicine injections for the treatment of senile severe pneumonia from the establishment of the library to January 2023. The literature was assessed for risk of bias using the Review Manager 5.3 software. Study outcome indicators were statistically analyzed using Stata 14.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software. Results: Thirty-three studies were included with a total of 2598 patients. The main outcome indicator was the clinical effective rate. Secondary outcome indicators were white blood cell count, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein. The results of network meta-analysis showed that clinical efficacy of Reduning injection combined with conventional drug had the better effect. Xiyanping injection combined with conventional drug could better reduce white blood cell and C-reactive protein indicators. Xuebijing injection combined with conventional drug had better ability to reduce procalcitonin. Conclusion: Reduning…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,598 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free