Evidence Hub

Cerebrovascular risk factors and MRI abnormalities in migraine

Rao R, Rosati A, Liberini P, Gipponi S, Venturelli E, Sapia E, Ambrosi C, Padovani A

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2008

1,201 participants

Abstract

Case series have demonstrated an increased incidence of white matter lesions (WMLs) in patients with migraine. It is controversial whether the evidence of subclinical brain lesions relates to a higher risk of cerebrovascular disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) subclinical brain lesions and cerebrovascular risk factors (hyperhomocysteinaemia, MTHFR genotype, patent foramen ovale, hypertension, smoking and hypercholesterolaemia). From our database of 1201 patients followed at our Headache Clinic since September 2003 we analysed the MRI findings of 253 individuals. All MRI were blindly analysed by a second neuroradiologist (C.A.) and patients with WMLs (study group) were evaluated. In order to assess the association of WMLs with specific vascular risk factors, patients with WMLs were matched, according to age, sex and ICHD II diagnosis, with an equal number of individuals with normal MRI (control group). Headache was classified by the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD 2004) criteria. We did not find any statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to the presence of the cerebrovascular disease risk factors considered. Our results confirm that the WMLs are not related to the cerebrovascular disease risk factors.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 1,201 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free