Evidence Hub

Periorbital botulinum toxin A improves photophobia and sensations of dryness in patients without migraine: Case series of four patients

Venkateswaran N, Hwang J, Rong AJ, Levitt AE, Diel RJ, Levitt RC, Sarantopoulos KD, Lee WW et al.

American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2020

27 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Individuals receiving botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injections in the head and neck for migraine treatment have reported decreases in photophobia and sensations of dryness, independent of ocular surface parameters. We hypothesized that patients without migraine but with similar ocular neuropathic-like symptoms would also experience symptomatic improvement with periocular BoNT-A injections, independent of ocular surface changes.

Observations: We identified four individuals without a history of migraine but with neuropathic ocular pain (symptoms of dryness, burning, and photophobia that were out of proportion to ocular surface findings and unresponsive to ongoing dry eye (DE) therapies). Individuals underwent 1 session of periocular BoNT-A injections. Validated questionnaires (Visual Light Sensitivity Questionnaire-8, Dry Eye Questionnaire-5) assessed photophobia and DE symptoms pre- and 1-month post-injections. All four reported improvements in frequency and severity of photophobia and eye discomfort following BoNT-A injections. Tear film parameters (phenol red thread test, tear break-up time, corneal staining, and Schirmer test) and eyelid (palpebral fissure height and levator palpebrae superioris function) and eyebrow (position) anatomy were also evaluated before and after injections. Despite a unanimous improvement in symptoms, there were no consistent changes in ocular surface parameters with BoNT-A injections across individuals.

Conclusions: Periocular BoNT-A shows…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free