Evidence Hub

CGRP-pathway exposure during the pre-EBP interval in spontaneous intracranial hypotension: an exploratory retrospective case series

Yin CY, Chang KH, Hsu YC, An YC, Yang IF, Yang FC

BMC neurology, 2026

Abstract

Background: Given hypothesized involvement of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in trigeminovascular pain and the frequent migrainous features of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH), we describe temporal associations between initiation of CGRP-pathway therapies and short-term symptom changes during the interval before image-guided epidural blood patch (pre-EBP) in seven consecutively managed SIH patients. Because this is a small retrospective uncontrolled series, we report exploratory observations only.

Case presentation: Work-up included selective head-up tilt testing and heavily T2-weighted MR myelography demonstrating predominantly cervicothoracic and/or multifocal spinal CSF leaks. During the pre-EBP interval patients received CGRP-pathway agents: monoclonal antibodies (fremanezumab n = 1; galcanezumab n = 3) and/or gepants (atogepant n = 4; rimegepant PRN n = 1). Five of seven patients (71%) met a pre-specified rubric of clinically meaningful improvement documented after CGRP initiation; in all seven patients with routinely charted Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) scores the median NRS reduction was 3 points (range 1-4). Positional orthostatic features commonly persisted until after EBP. Median interval from CGRP initiation to targeted EBP was 7 days. In this small cohort we did not observe an obvious signal that pre-EBP CGRP exposure impaired subsequent clinical response to EBP; however, the sample size and short follow-up preclude conclusions about rare or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free