Evidence Hub

Hemiplegic migraine: genetics and pathophysiology

Pietrobon D

The Journal of clinical investigation, 2026

Abstract

Rare monogenic subtypes of migraine with aura, which include an autosomal dominant form of hemiplegic migraine (HM), are caused by exonic mutations whose functional consequences can be studied in cellular and animal models of the disease. This allows investigation of the neurobiological mechanisms at the molecular, cellular, and circuit level. Here, I review current knowledge of the genetics and pathophysiology of HM. After considering the genes whose mutations cause familial HM (FHM) and discussing how the encoded proteins are affected by the mutations, I consider the mouse models generated by introducing human FHM mutations in the orthologous genes, Cana1a, Atp1a2, and Scna1a. I discuss their phenotypes, highlighting their shared increased susceptibility to experimentally induced cortical spreading depression (CSD, the phenomenon which underlies migraine aura and may trigger the headache mechanisms) and migraine-relevant pain behaviors. I examine the alterations in the cerebral cortex and the mechanisms underlying the facilitation of CSD in the mouse models as well as the alterations in the trigeminovascular pain pathway and their possible contributions to migraine-relevant pain phenotypes. Finally, I discuss the translational implications of the pathogenic mechanisms of CSD facilitation.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free