Evidence Hub

Triggered saccadic oscillations: case series and review of the literature

E. Oh, J. Choi, Sang Jun Park, Hyun Sung Kim, Seo-Young Choi, Kwang-Dong Choi

Journal of Neurology, 2024

16 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Saccadic oscillations (SOs) mostly occur spontaneously, but can be occasionally triggered by various stimuli. To determine clinical characteristics and underlying mechanisms of triggered SOs, we analyzed the clinical features and quantitative eye-movement recordings of six new patients and 10 patients in the literature who exhibited with triggered SOs. Eleven of the 16 patients (69%) had a lesion involving cerebellum and/or brainstem such as cerebellar degeneration, cerebellitis, or cerebellar infarction. The other causes were vestibular migraine (n = 2), multiple sclerosis (n = 1), Krabbe disease (n = 1), and idiopathic (n = 1). Vestibular stimulation was the most common trigger (n = 11, 69%), followed by removal of visual fixation (n = 4, 25%), hyperventilation (n = 1), light (n = 1), and blink (n = 1). The types of triggered SOs were varied which included ocular flutter (n = 13), opsoclonus (n = 3), vertical SOs (n = 2), and macrosaccadic oscillations (n = 1). Three patients exhibited downbeat nystagmus either before (n = 1) or after (n = 2) the onset of SOs. The frequency of triggered SOs ranged from 4 to 15 Hz, and oscillations with smaller amplitudes had higher frequencies and smaller peak velocities. SOs can be triggered by the modulation of unstable saccadic neural networks through vestibular and visual inputs in lesions of the brainstem and cerebellum.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free