Evidence Hub

Recurrent migraine: cost-effective care

Rapoport AM

Neurology, 1994

Abstract

The cost of untreated or ineffectively treated migraine is staggering. A case study is presented that demonstrates the importance of developing an individually tailored home treatment program for migraine patients aimed at keeping them out of healthcare facilities on an acute basis. Treatment programs should include preventive medications if attacks occur more than twice per month, as well as appropriate abortive and symptomatic agents in the event of a severe, acute migraine attack. New agents and treatment modalities are making acute treatment more cost-effective and making it less likely that unnecessary time be spent seeking medical help at the time of an attack.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free