Evidence Hub

Intravenous combined with nebulized polymyxin B may be effective in treating carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli hospital-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study

Ye Zhang, Jiang-Tao Chen, Lexin Fang, Min Wang, Wenqing Zeng, Yueping Ding

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2025

44 participants

Abstract

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous polymyxin B versus the combination of intravenous and nebulized polymyxin B for treating carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli hospital-acquired pneumonia (CRGNB-HAP), and to explore the risk factors affecting 28-day all-cause mortality. Our retrospective analysis was conducted on data from CRGNB-HAP patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) with either intravenous polymyxin B alone or in conjunction with nebulized polymyxin B between November 28, 2018 and May 6, 2024. The primary endpoint was 28-day all-cause mortality, while safety outcomes were also assessed. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify the risk factors associated with 28-day all-cause mortality. A total of 82 CRGNB-HAP patients were enrolled, including 38 patients in the intravenous plus nebulized (IV + NL) polymyxin B group and 44 patients in the intravenous (IV) polymyxin B group. The 28-day mortality rate of the IV + NL polymyxin B group was significantly lower than that of the IV polymyxin B group (23.7% vs 61.4%, p < 0.001), and there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of acute kidney injury between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that IV + NL polymyxin B administration was a significant factor in reducing the 28-day mortality rate of CRGNB-HAP patients. Our study found that intravenous combined with nebulized polymyxin B therapy is superior to intravenous…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 44 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free