Evidence Hub

Eleven-Year Diagnostic Delay in Episodic Cluster Headache With a Characteristic International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd Edition (ICHD-3) Clinical Pattern: A Case of Migraine Misdiagnosis and Otologic Confusion

Kang S, Adi A, Shetty PV, Alskaf A

Cureus, 2026

Abstract

Cluster headache is a primary headache disorder characterized by recurrent attacks of severe unilateral headache accompanied by ipsilateral cranial autonomic symptoms. Despite well-established diagnostic criteria, it remains one of the most frequently misdiagnosed primary headache disorders, resulting in substantial diagnostic delay. We report a diagnostic dilemma involving a 31-year-old man with episodic cluster headache who remained undiagnosed for 11 years despite a clinical presentation highly consistent with the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) criteria. Throughout the disease course, he experienced recurrent severe unilateral orbital pain lasting 30-60 minutes, occurring more than three times daily during annual cluster periods and accompanied by ipsilateral lacrimation, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, and marked restlessness. However, he was repeatedly diagnosed with migraine without aura and later underwent ophthalmologic and otolaryngologic evaluations, further delaying recognition of the characteristic headache pattern. Detailed reassessment of the clinical history ultimately led to a clinical diagnosis of episodic cluster headache, and guideline-recommended therapy was followed by substantial clinical improvement. The principal educational feature of this case is how prominent ipsilateral ear pain and distracting otologic and ophthalmologic findings contributed to delayed recognition of an otherwise characteristic cluster…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free