Evidence Hub

Cystatin C as a Predictor of Severe Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Cohort Study

Yanglingxi Wang, Weiduo Zhou, D. Wen, Yong-Bing Deng, Xiaodong Zhao, H. Ruan, An-Qiang Zhang, Peng Chen

Journal of Neurotrauma, 2025

153 participants

Abstract

This study aimed to identify core differential proteins associated with severe hospital-acquired pneumonia (sHAP) complicating the hospitalization of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients through proteomic analysis. It further explored their association with sHAP and evaluated their predictive value. This single-center cohort study collected general clinical characteristics and biological indicators from 153 TBI patients admitted to the neurosurgery department of Chongqing Emergency Medical Center between February 4, 2021, and May 10, 2024. We performed quantitative analysis of differential proteins associated with sHAP and identified Cystatin C (CysC) as a key differential protein. Logistic regression modeling assessed the correlation between serum CysC concentration at the 24-h cut-off point and the occurrence of sHAP. The predictive value of CysC for sHAP was evaluated using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and the Kaplan–Meier method. The study included 153 TBI patients with a mean age of 48.7 ± 14.6 years, comprising 118 (77.1%) males and 35 (22.9%) females. Of these, 43 patients developed sHAP, with a mean CysC serum concentration of 120.8 ± 17.7 µg/L, while the 110 patients who did not develop sHAP had a mean CysC serum concentration of 92.7 ± 18.4 µg/L. After adjusting for multiple factors, each 1 µg/L increase in CysC levels was associated with a 9% increase in sHAP incidence (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.06–1.13). In the ROC curve analysis, CysC…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 153 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free